Friday’s are our Weekend Edition shows. Penna Dexter and Kelly Shackelford take their places around the table with Kerby. Together they talk about the top stories of the week and share analysis from a biblical point of view.
We invite your comments, questions and thoughts on the issues by calling the on-air comment line at (800) 351-1212.
For eight years she served as Marlin Maddoux’s co-host on Point of View and for two years she co-hosted a daily drive time live broadcast on the Dallas-based Criswell Radio Network.
Penna’s interest in conservative politics and the issues that affect the family began when she was a child working on political campaigns with her parents. She graduated from the University of Southern California with a degree in International Relations. She spent 8 years in the banking industry. She and her husband Todd have three children who are in their twenties. They are members of Trinity Presbyterian Church.
That’s what First Liberty President Kelly Shackelford asked over 2,000 attendees at last weekend’s Values Voter Summit in Washington, D.C.
Sharing stories of First Liberty clients who have been discriminated against, fired and even financially penalized for their faith, Shackelford emphasized the hope that exists for religious freedom if Americans are willing to defend it.
Shackelford pointed to evidence that despite the rising hostility toward people of faith in America, religious liberty cases often win in court. He pointed specifically to First Liberty’s rate of victory “for over 15 years in a row”—90 percent.
Shackelford attributed the high percentage to “top attorneys in the country” who give their time to work on religious liberty cases locally, and current legal precedent supporting religious freedom.
First Liberty’s high victory rate has even survived a historic skyrocket in legal attacks, Shackelford told summit attendees from the main stage on Friday.
“We went from 260 legal matters in 2014 to 513 legal matters in 2015, and 513 legal matters was turning away 90 percent of the requests,” he said, adding that the need for more attorneys is “huge.”
Hillary and the Democrats have based their campaign on demonizing Donald Trump, calling him dangerous, unpredictable, racist, Islamophobic, demagogic, sexist, lacking in temperament and judgement, bombastic, jingoistic and a litany of other names.
His supporters belong in a "basket of deplorables."
It is a campaign conducted by a speechwriter with a well-thumbed thesaurus.
Against Barry Goldwater in 1964 and George McGovern in 1972, such a strategy of name calling could and did work. But now we have televised debates. (There were none in '64 or '72).
We will meet Donald and will see that he is none of the things Hillary says he is. Before he takes a single stand on a single issue, it will be evident that he is not the diabolic candidate Hillary paints.
In some cases, the road is coming up to meet him. The problems he has focused on have become so serious that his formerly extreme rhetoric now makes sense. How can we look at the mayhem caused by an Afghani immigrant without thinking about stopping more from coming in?