Banning Gendered Terms
Penna Dexter
Whenever there’s a new session of Congress, the House of Representatives adopts a new set of rules to govern the way it conducts business. For the 117th, Congress House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern have proposed a rules package they claim “makes the House of Representatives the most inclusive in history.”
There’s a section that eliminates all gendered terms. If the rules package is adopted by the full House, only “gender-inclusive language” will be allowed in House rules. So where the terms “father” and “mother” now appear in the House Code of Official Conduct, they would be replaced with “parent;” “husband” and “wife” would be “spouse;” “son” and “daughter” would be “child;” and “brother” and “sister” would be ”sibling.”
Then it really gets awkward: “Aunt” and “uncle” must be replaced with “parent’s sibling” and “cousin” must be “sibling’s child.” And for the in-laws, the new terms are “parent-in-law”, “child-in-law” and “sibling-in-law.” “Grandson” and “granddaughter” would be out. “Grandchild” would be used instead. “Stepmother, stepfather, stepson, stepdaughter stepbrother,” and “stepsister” are out. “Stepparent, stepchild,” and “stepsibling” are in.
And so on.
In Rule X of the House, the word “seaman” appears. It would have to be replaced with “seafarer.” “Chairman” would be replaced with “Chair.”
These language requirements are for House rules, not floor speeches or bills. But this hat tip to the far Left’s desire to eliminate every distinction between the sexes is silly and just makes it harder to communicate clearly.
Believe me, there will be more of this pronoun and other gender-neutral-policy nonsense. The proposed new rules establish a permanent Office of Diversity and Inclusion. Expect affirmative action and quota requirements for the hiring of House staff.
In its “Blueprint for Positive Change,” the Human Rights Campaign laid out a list of 85 recommendations to the Administration to elevate and enact LGBTQ policy demands. It appears that leaders in Congress are already acting on it.
Listen to this Viewpoint
Viewpoints
View All
Place For Prayer
Some people might wonder why we need a law that protects the right of houses of worship to use their facilities for religious purposes. But we do. And we have one: RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and I...
AI’s Boom and Doom
Perhaps you have noticed AI’s boom and doom. One minute, investors were talking about the wonderful benefits of artificial intelligence and encouraging potential investors to throw their money at AI d...
Social Security
Most federal reports are unfortunately greeted with a yawn. But the report from the trustees who oversee Social Security deserved more attention than it received.
Take Action
View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...
Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.