VIEW VIEWPOINT

Judicial Filibuster

Written by Kerby Anderson December 3 - 2014
Now that Republicans will control the U.S. Senate, some senators have been debating whether to restore the 60-vote filibuster rule for confirming judicial appointments. I think that would be a very bad decision, for many reasons. Historically the filibuster was not used to stop presidential appointments. A majority is all that is needed to pass legislation, but the Senate filibuster has been used to prevent a vote on key appointments and legislation. I have never understood why 41 members of the Senate should have the power to prevent 59 members of the Senate from voting on appointments made by the president. The U.S. Senate is given the power of advice and consent, but is not supposed to block presidential appointments by using a filibuster. Senate Majority leader Harry Reid changed the Senate rules in the last session of Congress to make it easier for President Obama get his judicial appointments on the federal bench. No longer could a filibuster be used to block presidential appointments. While we might disagree with the way he did this and even why he did it, we should welcome the change. The Democratic Senate changed the rules. I believe the new Republican Senate should follow the same rules. The framers of the Constitution assumed that appointments would pass or fail on a majority vote. They did require a super majority for making treaties or amending the Constitution. They did not intend that a super majority of 60 votes would be needed to confirm a presidential appointment. Recent political history is another reason Republicans should not change the Senate rules. Democrats used the filibuster against all sorts of nominees by President George W. Bush. Appointees like Miguel Estrada, Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla Owen, Charles Pickering, and others were victims of the Democratic filibuster. The Senate filibuster of presidential appointments to the federal bench has been used in the past to pursue partisan political goals. There is no need to return to a Senate filibuster of presidential appointments. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/12-03-2014.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1792436339 6ad668737c9c3
October 20, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lynching

Wilfred Reilly has spent years exposing false narratives about racism and racist actions. In his latest article, he explains “What Happens When the Demand for Racism Exceeds Supply?". He makes the sam...

Listen
1792389289 6ad5b0a95f457
October 19, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lack of Affordability

The 2026 election was about many issues, but a significant one was the lack of affordability. Unfortunately, few politicians want to admit that the real reason is the declining value of the dollar. Po...

Listen
1792042831 6ad0674fdc19c
October 16, 2026
Penna Dexter

Place For Prayer

Some people might wonder why we need a law that protects the right of houses of worship to use their facilities for religious purposes. But we do. And we have one: RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and I...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.