VIEW VIEWPOINT

Little Sisters — Again

Written by Kerby Anderson May 15 - 2020
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints
The Little Sisters of the Poor is a religious order that runs nursing homes for the poor. They’re back at the U.S. Supreme Court to, hopefully, conclude their nearly-8-year battle against the ObamaCare contraceptive mandate obligating these nuns to provide their employees with birth control. Under the Affordable Care Act, workplace health plans are supposed to cover “preventative care,” which the Obama Administration said meant birth control, with no out-of-pocket costs. Churches are exempt and the Hobby Lobby case won exemptions for closely held businesses whose owners hold faith-based objections to the mandate. For Hobby Lobby the issue was that some contraceptives work by causing abortions. The Obama Administration created an “accommodation” that provided cost-free contraception through alternate means. The Little Sisters argue they need an exemption, not an alternate way to comply with the contraceptive mandate. In 2016 the high court agreed to hear Zubick v. Burwell, a case that involved the sisters and other non-profits who sincerely object to paying for contraceptives. Upon the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, to avoid a 4-4 split, the Court opted not to rule on the merits and instead vacated the lower court cases and sent them back to their respective states to consider, based on the accommodation. In 2017, the Trump Administration issued new rules providing even broader protections to the Little Sisters and other employers with religious and moral objections to the mandate. Pennsylvania, where the Little Sisters is headquartered, and New Jersey sued, arguing that the Trump Administration exceeded its power and that the opt-out proposed by the government “does not substantially burden religious exercise.” Last week, the justices heard oral arguments via teleconference with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dialing in from her hospital bed. The current pandemic makes the Little Sisters’ work more difficult and much riskier. The Justices would do well to hand them a sweeping victory so they can continue the work we as a society need them to do. penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789700768 6aacaaa0c1f83
September 18, 2026
Penna Dexter

Explaining NEET

A young conservative Anglican, who goes by the pseudonym Crier in the Wilderness, has an essay at Virtue Online that attempts to explain a category of young men who are not in a good place. They are N...

Listen
1789515203 6aa9d5c3b2f29
September 18, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Birth Tourism

Although the Supreme Court reaffirmed that birthright citizenship is constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, there is the related issue of birth tourism. Unfortunately, the media tends to confl...

Listen
1789515130 6aa9d57a3043b
September 17, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Message to Students

Emily Austin recently spoke at the Christians United for Israel conference. She had a message for the students protesting America and calling for revolution.  First, she asked them if they “have an...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.