VIEW VIEWPOINT

Paid Not to Work

Written by Kerby Anderson May 5 - 2020
Kerby Andersonnever miss viewpoints
If you take a political science class, your professor will probably talk about how often government policies have unintended consequences. We have before us right now a perfect example of that. But let me hasten to add that unintended consequences don’t always mean unexpected consequences. A number of US senators saw this coming, but Congress did not listen. Jamie Black-Lewis owns two spas in Washington state. Although her businesses were closed, she was ecstatic that she qualified for two small-business loans through the Paycheck Protection Program. She was eager to share the good news with her employees. They did not take it as good news. She said there was a “firestorm of hatred about the situation.” They calculated they would make more by not working, considering that the CARES Act added an additional $600 a week benefit to their existing unemployment benefits. Kurt Huffman, owner of restaurants in Portland, Oregon, had to lay off hundreds of workers. But he was able to adapt with takeout and delivery. He needed to hire back some of his employees. It didn’t go well, and so he did the math. A starting wage for a line cook is about $640 a week. Oregon’s unemployment offers about $416 per week. But the additional $600 federal bonus means that same worker would make $1,016. Why would anyone take a pay cut to go back to work? This doesn’t mean that workers are lazy. They are just making rational decisions based on the economic incentives created by Congress. A number of Republican senators like Ben Sasse, Lindsey Graham, Tim Scott, and Rick Scott saw this coming. When they raised a concern about the bill in Congress becoming a disincentive to work, they were criticized in the media and voted down in Congress. When you pay people more not to work, what do you expect? The unintended consequence is that people will stay home and make more money. viewpoints new web version

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789515580 6aa9d73c22942
September 21, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lazy Savings

Ursula von der Leyen is the President of the European Union. She was in the news the other day for saying that savings were “lazy.” That may have been an unfortunate translation, since I think it woul...

Listen
1789700768 6aacaaa0c1f83
September 18, 2026
Penna Dexter

Explaining NEET

A young conservative Anglican, who goes by the pseudonym Crier in the Wilderness, has an essay at Virtue Online that attempts to explain a category of young men who are not in a good place. They are N...

Listen
1789515203 6aa9d5c3b2f29
September 18, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Birth Tourism

Although the Supreme Court reaffirmed that birthright citizenship is constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, there is the related issue of birth tourism. Unfortunately, the media tends to confl...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.