Nadine Strossen has written, taught, and advocated extensively in the areas of constitutional law and civil liberties. From 1991 to 2008, she served as President of the American Civil Liberties Union, the first woman to head the nation’s largest and oldest civil liberties organization. Professor Strossen is currently a member of the ACLU’s National Advisory Council, as well as the Advisory Boards of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), Heterodox Academy, and the National Coalition Against Censorship.
Her 2018 book, HATE: Why We Should Resist It With Free Speech, Not Censorship, has been widely praised by ideologically diverse experts.
The National Law Journal has named Strossen one of America’s "100 Most Influential Lawyers," and several other publications have named her one of the country’s most influential women.
Professor Strossen’s writings have been published in many scholarly and general-interest publications. Her co-authored book, Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, was named an “outstanding book” by the Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Human Rights in North America.
In 1986, Professor Strossen became one of the first three women to receive the U.S. Jaycees’ Ten Outstanding Young Americans Award; she was also the first American woman to win the Jaycees International’s Ten Outstanding Young Persons of the World Award. She has received honorary Doctor of Law degrees from the University of Rhode Island, the University of Vermont, San Joaquin College of Law, Rocky Mountain College, the Massachusetts School of Law, and Mount Holyoke College.
Professor Strossen is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

50 migrants arriving at ground zero of wealthy, liberal, white privilege, Martha’s Vineyard, exploded the liberal "sanctuary city" facade.

“Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.” —Winston Churchill

By: Dan McLaughlin - nationalreview.com - September 20, 2022 There is a hilariously large gulf between what progressive TV commentators think they know about history and what they actually know. On occasion, they make the ...

Those who repress inconvenient facts or produce fictitious evidence to nourish a politically convenient story are simply not historians.