VIEW VIEWPOINT

Climate Reparations

Written by Penna Dexter December 2 - 2022
Penna Dexternever miss viewpoints

Negotiators at the latest United Nations climate conference are touting a “breakthrough agreement” emanating from their recent gathering in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt. COS27 — the 27th UN climate conference — ended with commitments by the U.S. and other wealthy countries to compensate poor countries for the damage allegedly caused by climate change.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the rationale for setting up this “loss and damage” fund is that “industrialization has increased temperatures and led to natural disasters.” John Kerry, chief negotiator for the U.S., has said such transfers could run into the trillions of dollars. Yet President Biden signed us up.

As the Journal’s Gerard Baker explains, “The idea is that developing countries are being literally inundated with the costs of climate change in the form of rising sea levels, extreme weather, and other horsemen of the meteorological apocalypse.” This assumes that human-caused climate change is the cause of these disasters — a premise that’s far from settled.

In a column titled, “The West Made the World Prosperous and Now We Must Pay,” Gerard Baker argues against “the idea that the least developed countries in the world have received only the cost of industrialization and not its many benefits.” But advocates for climate justice insist that, because the U.S. became wealthy using fossil fuels, we must pay “climate reparations” to countries the UN defines as “developing.”

Poor nations suffer disproportionately from natural disasters because they are poor. In their quest to banish fossil fuels from the planet, UN climate warriors have been pushing for policies that would deny developing nations access to the cheap, reliable sources of energy they need for growth. Ten years ago, the U.N. established a fund to pay poor countries to forgo the use of fossil fuels. Rich countries are supposed to contribute $100 billion per year. Washington Post columnist Marc Theissen asks, “Why should American taxpayers pay developing countries not to develop?”

Climate reparations will never replace good economic policy.penna's vp small

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789618406 6aab68e61cb17
September 22, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Our Neighbors?

One of my frequent lines is: He who defines the terms often wins the debate. Progressives refer to people who support abortion as “pro-choice.” Who isn’t in favor of choice? They may define people who...

Listen
1789515580 6aa9d73c22942
September 21, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lazy Savings

Ursula von der Leyen is the President of the European Union. She was in the news the other day for saying that savings were “lazy.” That may have been an unfortunate translation, since I think it woul...

Listen
1789700768 6aacaaa0c1f83
September 18, 2026
Penna Dexter

Explaining NEET

A young conservative Anglican, who goes by the pseudonym Crier in the Wilderness, has an essay at Virtue Online that attempts to explain a category of young men who are not in a good place. They are N...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.