How law can support parents. In the past few years, the United States has witnessed a significant shift in public opinion and policymaking about children’s use of social media platforms.

The justices will decide if the president can redefine the citizenship clause found in the Fourteenth Amendment to exclude children of mothers in the country temporarily or illegally.

When it comes to children’s upbringing and education, bureaucrats are again proving they don’t know best.

Research shows there’s no longer any significant correlation between regular church attendance and the likelihood of being pro-life.

Doctors dispute another ProPublica report suggesting pro-life states endanger the health of pregnant women.

When The Free Press started reporting on gender ideology, it was a third rail. Today, the tide has turned, writes Emily Yoffe.

It’s now clear that the law cannot simultaneously uphold a child’s right to their mother and father and affirm same-sex marriage.

Artificial intelligence is replacing young people’s social intuitions.

  Platforms that match partners in procreation are experiencing a post-pandemic uptick.

It’s no secret that addictive digital technologies like smartphones and social media apps are harming a generation of kids socially, mentally, and even physically. But a workable solution seems elusive. After all, don’t kids need phones, and won’t they be vulnerable or socially isolated without tech?