VIEW VIEWPOINT

Black Family

Written by Kerby Anderson February 25 - 2015
During Black History Month, we need to look back 50 years to a report that accurately predicted where we are today. Daniel Patrick Moynihan was working as an assistant secretary in President Lyndon Johnson’s Labor Department. His report documented and predicted troubling family trends among inner city blacks because of the increasing number of fatherless homes. In a recent op-ed, Jason Riley says that these warnings 50 years ago have come true. He then asks, “Will liberals ever forgive him?” I doubt it. They attacked him when the report was issued. I don’t see too many willing to come to his defense today. Daniel Patrick Moynihan believed that the fundamental issue in the black community was family structure. “The evidence—not final but powerfully persuasive—is that the Negro family in the urban ghettos is crumbling.” His insight was accurate, but most ignored his report. The rest denounced him as a “victim-blaming racist” who would undermine the civil-rights movement. So government bureaucrats continued to form policies that penalized marriage and subsidized single parenting. What has been the result over these last 50 years? Back in 1965, one-quarter (25%) of black children lived in a household headed by a single mother. Today more than 70 percent of all black births are to unmarried women. Homes without fathers have more problems. Jason Riley reminds us of the extensive research that shows that teen pregnancy, drug abuse, the dropout rate and many other social problems grew dramatically when fathers were absent. One 2002 study from the University of California, Santa Barbara concluded that “the most critical factor affecting the prospect that a male youth will encounter the criminal justice system is the presence of his father in the home.” We could also add that the poverty rate for married black couples is a fraction of what it is for the black population in general. Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right, and his warnings should have been considered. His observations are as relevant now as they were 50 years ago. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/02-25-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1789618406 6aab68e61cb17
September 22, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Our Neighbors?

One of my frequent lines is: He who defines the terms often wins the debate. Progressives refer to people who support abortion as “pro-choice.” Who isn’t in favor of choice? They may define people who...

Listen
1789515580 6aa9d73c22942
September 21, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lazy Savings

Ursula von der Leyen is the President of the European Union. She was in the news the other day for saying that savings were “lazy.” That may have been an unfortunate translation, since I think it woul...

Listen
1789700768 6aacaaa0c1f83
September 18, 2026
Penna Dexter

Explaining NEET

A young conservative Anglican, who goes by the pseudonym Crier in the Wilderness, has an essay at Virtue Online that attempts to explain a category of young men who are not in a good place. They are N...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.