VIEW VIEWPOINT

Churches and Zoning

Written by Kerby Anderson January 7 - 2015
A case involving a church sign is headed to the Supreme Court. While that might seem like a trivial case, it illustrates what may become a major battleground between church and state. A small church in Arizona relies on temporary signs to direct worshipers to its services. This Presbyterian Church rents space in various places for its services. So they depend on putting up cardboard signs to direct people to the latest location. The town of Gilbert, Arizona restricts such signs, but does not appear to restrict other signs put up by politicians and even signs put up by the homeowner associations. One picture I saw showed one fence completely covered with campaign signs during the last election. In the background you can even see signs on other walls like “For Sale By Owner.” It is hard to believe that a temporary sign directing people to a worship service would have any negative effect on the aesthetics of the community. At stake is much more than aesthetics. The case raises this question: Does government have the right to censor the type of content citizens promote? This is not only a freedom of religion question: it’s a free speech question. And it raises questions about how zoning will affect churches in the future. On my radio program, I have suggested that future church-state battles won’t be over school prayer or the posting of the Ten Commandments as much as they will be battles between cities and churches over zoning. A church in Texas was told it could not hold services in their rented space because a local ordinance bans a church or a school from meeting on the property. A church in Georgia had to hold its services in the basement of a jewelry store because churches cannot meet on property of less than three acres. A church in Illinois could meet and pray on their property, just not on Sunday mornings. And they could not call their property a church. This growing list of restrictions may be why the Supreme Court decided to hear a church sign case. How these justices rule will impact lots of churches in America. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/01-07-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
Young Men
September 23, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Young Men

On several occasions, I have talked about the fact that a significant percentage of young men are in not in the workforce, and many of them aren’t even looking for work.

Listen
1789618406 6aab68e61cb17
September 22, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Our Neighbors?

One of my frequent lines is: He who defines the terms often wins the debate. Progressives refer to people who support abortion as “pro-choice.” Who isn’t in favor of choice? They may define people who...

Listen
1789515580 6aa9d73c22942
September 21, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lazy Savings

Ursula von der Leyen is the President of the European Union. She was in the news the other day for saying that savings were “lazy.” That may have been an unfortunate translation, since I think it woul...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.