VIEW VIEWPOINT

Frozen Embryos

Written by Kerby Anderson April 30 - 2015
If a celebrity couple separates, should the couple’s frozen embryos be destroyed or put up for adoption? That is the question surrounding the actress Sofia Vergara. She is best known for her role in the TV program Modern Family or for her furniture commercials. She is now in the spotlight over a bioethics issue. She and her ex Nick Loeb have two frozen embryos that were created when they were still in a relationship. They aren’t in a relationship now, so Nick Loeb brought a lawsuit against Sofia Vergara because he doesn’t want the embryos destroyed. But she doesn’t want the frozen embryos implanted in her. Some of this might be a publicity stunt since there is no evidence that Sofia Vergara wants to destroy the embryos. Her lawyer says she “never suggested that she wanted to have the embryos destroyed.” And there is a section in the contract that states that “unless otherwise directed by both of us in writing in person or by notarized letter, the Center shall continue to store the Cryopreserved Material for an indefinite period of time.” This celebrity spat illustrates a larger issue. She does not want the baby. He (and perhaps she) doesn’t want the embryos destroyed. We need King Solomon to help resolve this moral impasse. Of course, I have already mentioned one possibility: embryo adoption. An infertile couple could adopt these frozen embryos and begin the adoption journey nine months earlier with pregnancy and childbirth. This may be the only pro-life solution to this moral dilemma. We aren’t talking about frozen sperm or eggs (that have 23 chromosomes). We are talking about frozen embryos (that have 46 chromosomes). Everything a human being needs genetically is already present in these frozen embryos. If you don’t like the moral dilemma and ethical circumstances surrounding these frozen embryos, you are not alone. That is why we need to think through the implications before we create embryos in the laboratory and then freeze them for future use. These frozen embryos are currently in legal and medical limbo. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/04-30-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1786663334 6a7e51a66837e
August 14, 2026
Penna Dexter

Blue City Results

Blue cities throughout the U.S. are struggling. Sometimes their solutions are making their problems worse.

Listen
1786568413 6a7cdedd35a34
August 14, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Discernment

Christians have always needed discernment, but we especially need to develop our skill at discernment in our confused world. One book I would recommend is: Why Bad Looks Good: Biblical Wisdom to Make...

Listen
1786488303 6a7ba5efc13fa
August 13, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Christian Worldview

What does the word “Christian” mean these days? It doesn’t seem to mean very much. The last few reports from the George Barna’s Cultural Research Center at Arizona Christian University reveal that a v...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.