VIEW VIEWPOINT

Frozen Embryos

Written by Kerby Anderson April 30 - 2015
If a celebrity couple separates, should the couple’s frozen embryos be destroyed or put up for adoption? That is the question surrounding the actress Sofia Vergara. She is best known for her role in the TV program Modern Family or for her furniture commercials. She is now in the spotlight over a bioethics issue. She and her ex Nick Loeb have two frozen embryos that were created when they were still in a relationship. They aren’t in a relationship now, so Nick Loeb brought a lawsuit against Sofia Vergara because he doesn’t want the embryos destroyed. But she doesn’t want the frozen embryos implanted in her. Some of this might be a publicity stunt since there is no evidence that Sofia Vergara wants to destroy the embryos. Her lawyer says she “never suggested that she wanted to have the embryos destroyed.” And there is a section in the contract that states that “unless otherwise directed by both of us in writing in person or by notarized letter, the Center shall continue to store the Cryopreserved Material for an indefinite period of time.” This celebrity spat illustrates a larger issue. She does not want the baby. He (and perhaps she) doesn’t want the embryos destroyed. We need King Solomon to help resolve this moral impasse. Of course, I have already mentioned one possibility: embryo adoption. An infertile couple could adopt these frozen embryos and begin the adoption journey nine months earlier with pregnancy and childbirth. This may be the only pro-life solution to this moral dilemma. We aren’t talking about frozen sperm or eggs (that have 23 chromosomes). We are talking about frozen embryos (that have 46 chromosomes). Everything a human being needs genetically is already present in these frozen embryos. If you don’t like the moral dilemma and ethical circumstances surrounding these frozen embryos, you are not alone. That is why we need to think through the implications before we create embryos in the laboratory and then freeze them for future use. These frozen embryos are currently in legal and medical limbo. Viewpoints by Kerby Anderson http://ncfr.net/ncfr.net/subdomains/commentary/Downloads/Kerby_Anderson/04-30-2015.mp3

Viewpoints

View All
1792436339 6ad668737c9c3
October 20, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lynching

Wilfred Reilly has spent years exposing false narratives about racism and racist actions. In his latest article, he explains “What Happens When the Demand for Racism Exceeds Supply?". He makes the sam...

Listen
1792389289 6ad5b0a95f457
October 19, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lack of Affordability

The 2026 election was about many issues, but a significant one was the lack of affordability. Unfortunately, few politicians want to admit that the real reason is the declining value of the dollar. Po...

Listen
1792042831 6ad0674fdc19c
October 16, 2026
Penna Dexter

Place For Prayer

Some people might wonder why we need a law that protects the right of houses of worship to use their facilities for religious purposes. But we do. And we have one: RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and I...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.