VIEW VIEWPOINT

Gullible Americans

Written by Kerby Anderson March 11 - 2020
Kerby Andersonnever miss viewpoints
Many years ago, Walter Williams wrote a column with the controversial title “Gullible Americans.” I thought about it now that Democrats seem ready to nominate a candidate who is planning to raise taxes. In his column, he reminded us that during the legislative debate about the 16th amendment, President William Taft and congressional supporters argued that only the rich would ever have to pay federal income taxes. When the amendment was enacted in 1913, only one-half of one percent did pay taxes. Walter Williams argued that Americans ratified the amendment because they were duped into believing only the rich would pay income taxes. It is worth noting that the founders made it impossible to have such a tax. That being said, Abraham Lincoln did impose an income tax on Americans to finance the war. It was later repealed. During the Grover Cleveland administration, Congress enacted the Income Tax Act of 1894. The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional. That is why the 16th amendment had to be passed in order to have an income tax. Walter Williams also cited Medicare as another example of gullible Americans. When it was enacted in 1966, Medicare cost $3 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee, along with President Lyndon Johnson, estimated that Medicare would cost an inflation-adjusted $12 billion by 1990. They were off by almost an order of magnitude. In 1990, Medicare topped $107 billion. Today Medicare costs more than $600 billion. We as Americans have been gullible when believing that a new tax won’t affect us. We have been gullible in thinking that a new government program will stay within the estimated budget. The question is whether we will be gullible again in this election year. viewpoints new web version

Listen to this Viewpoint

Viewpoints

View All
1789618406 6aab68e61cb17
September 22, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Our Neighbors?

One of my frequent lines is: He who defines the terms often wins the debate. Progressives refer to people who support abortion as “pro-choice.” Who isn’t in favor of choice? They may define people who...

Listen
1789515580 6aa9d73c22942
September 21, 2026
Kerby Anderson

Lazy Savings

Ursula von der Leyen is the President of the European Union. She was in the news the other day for saying that savings were “lazy.” That may have been an unfortunate translation, since I think it woul...

Listen
1789700768 6aacaaa0c1f83
September 18, 2026
Penna Dexter

Explaining NEET

A young conservative Anglican, who goes by the pseudonym Crier in the Wilderness, has an essay at Virtue Online that attempts to explain a category of young men who are not in a good place. They are N...

Listen

Take Action

View All
Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras
August 9, 2026

Protect Privacy Against Flock Cameras

Flock cameras are everywhere. While one camera is a tool, the more than 100,000 AI-powered cameras now posted around our nation are a new layer of dig...

Support the SAVE Act
July 20, 2026

Support the SAVE Act

SAVE Election Integrity with Voter ID.

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act
April 15, 2026

Support the Safeguarding Women from Chemical Abortion Act

The abortion pill harms women and kills unborn children. Congress must act.

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025
January 12, 2026

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

Pro-lifers have been abused under the FACE Act for long enough.